Fahrenheit 9/11

Michael Moore's controversial film can be viewed "good" or "bad" as an interpretation of the Bush administration depending on which people are watching it, and what side they are on. I certainly dislike the Bush administration for all of their false judgments that have made a big impact not only on Americans lives, but also the lives of others, and therefore believe the film was excellent even though it was biased on some of its facts or beliefs. I like how he showed the dead Iraqi people to sicken the stomachs of the many critics of the film, and the supporters of the war on Iraq. However, I also have read the two other opposing view points of Moore's film on the website, and I found out that some of their points were valid, like in the "Unfairenheit 9/11" by Christopher Hitchens, he talks about how if the president have responded instantly after the news of the second plane on 9/11, would make some people think that he went to war on a confused or insane dicision, and others think that he already knew the attack was coming and wanted to use it to empower himself. Both sides could be right or wrong, but it depends on people's judgments of the whole film. But, taking completely into one side and disregarding the other is a false judgment.